- Submit Case Verdict
- Commentary
- Jury Verdicts
- Welcome
- Appellate Decisions
- Issues
- Hollow Tropes: Fresh Perspectives on Courts, Politics, and Inequality
- Placing Your Faith in the Constitution
- Bad Advice Or Bad Laws? Allocating Responsibility Between Lawyers And Laws In The Context Of National Security Policymaking
- An Extraordinary Tale
- State Constitutional Politics
- Modernity, Religion, and the Public Sphere
- The Beautiful American Abroad
- The Alchemy of Dissent
- The Process of Balancing
- Getting Right Without Lincoln
- The Continued Renaissance Of Comparative Constitutional Law
- What We Say And What They Do: Public Perceptions Of Supreme Court Nominees And Judicial Activism On The Supreme Court
- Recent Issue
- Archives
- Storify Archives
- Symposium
- About Us
- Subscriptions
Modernity, Religion, and the Public Sphere
By Stephen M. Feldman | 45 Tul. L. Rev. 845 (2011)
Steven H. Shiffrin, in The Religious Left and Church-State Relations, and Winni-fred Fallers Sullivan, in Prison Religion: Faith-Based Reform and the Constitution, both challenge this liberal-conservative dichotomy. They suggest that we have reached this liberal-conservative impasse partly because of the forces animating modernity. Late-stage modernists generally have insisted that the only path to knowledge lay in experience: the empirical study of external reality. This commitment to empiricism ineluctably engendered, at least among intellectuals, an acceptance of ethical relativism: if knowledge must be grounded on experience, then ethical values seemingly could not be verified. (full article)