- Submit Case Verdict
- Commentary
- Jury Verdicts
- Welcome
- Appellate Decisions
- Issues
- Hollow Tropes: Fresh Perspectives on Courts, Politics, and Inequality
- Placing Your Faith in the Constitution
- Bad Advice Or Bad Laws? Allocating Responsibility Between Lawyers And Laws In The Context Of National Security Policymaking
- An Extraordinary Tale
- State Constitutional Politics
- Modernity, Religion, and the Public Sphere
- The Beautiful American Abroad
- The Alchemy of Dissent
- The Process of Balancing
- Getting Right Without Lincoln
- The Continued Renaissance Of Comparative Constitutional Law
- What We Say And What They Do: Public Perceptions Of Supreme Court Nominees And Judicial Activism On The Supreme Court
- Recent Issue
- Archives
- Storify Archives
- Symposium
- About Us
- Subscriptions
The Process of Balancing
by Oren Gross 45 Tul. L. Rev. 733 (2011)
Both Professor Donohue’s The Cost of Counterterrorism: Power, Politics, and Liberty and Judge Baker’s
In the Common Defense: National Security Law for Perilous Times, remind us that the discussion of tradeoffs and balancing between security and liberty is all too often premised on a perilous dichotomy and a false choice. “Security,” Baker reminds us, “is a predicate for liberty, not an alternative to liberty.”74 And Donohue echoes that by noting that the “security or freedom rubric” overlooks “many grave and complex problems.” Each author enhances our collective understanding of what is at stake and how to approach the challenges ahead. (full article)